Skip to main content
The tables below describe how strong and poor cognitive performance may present in safety-sensitive work environments. Use these as a guide when interpreting results on the Analysis page.

Reaction Time

Cognitive PerformanceExpected Behaviours in Safety-Sensitive Environments
Strong Reaction TimeResponds quickly to unexpected hazards (e.g., sudden stops, obstacles, alarms)
Maintains safe following distances and adjusts appropriately to changing conditions
Demonstrates timely decision-making in dynamic environments
Reduces likelihood of near-miss or incident escalation
Poor Reaction TimeDelayed response to hazards or changing conditions
Increased likelihood of harsh braking or late corrective actions
Difficulty keeping pace with dynamic environments (traffic, machinery, workflows)
Elevated risk of incidents due to slower hazard recognition and response

Attention

Cognitive PerformanceExpected Behaviours in Safety-Sensitive Environments
Strong AttentionMaintains consistent vigilance over extended periods
Effectively detects relevant changes in the environment (signals, alarms, anomalies)
Monitors multiple inputs simultaneously (instruments, surroundings, communications)
Demonstrates reliable situational awareness under routine and demanding conditions
Poor AttentionMay miss critical safety cues such as signals, alerts, or environmental changes
Reduced vigilance — slower to detect hazards or anomalies
Inconsistent monitoring of surroundings or systems
Increased likelihood of oversight-related incidents in safety-sensitive tasks

Control

Cognitive PerformanceExpected Behaviours in Safety-Sensitive Environments
Strong ControlDemonstrates steady, precise hand movements and fine motor coordination
Maintains physical composure and motor precision under pressure
Handles tools, controls, and equipment with consistent accuracy
Reliable manual dexterity in safety-critical operations
Poor ControlMay show reduced hand stability or fine motor precision
Less consistent accuracy when handling tools, controls, or equipment
Increased risk of imprecise movements in safety-critical manual tasks
Greater variability in motor performance under pressure or fatigue

Executive Function

Cognitive PerformanceExpected Behaviours in Safety-Sensitive Environments
Strong Executive FunctionPlans and sequences tasks effectively
Adapts to changing conditions with sound judgment
Prioritizes competing demands appropriately
Integrates information to make informed decisions
Poor Executive FunctionDifficulty organizing or sequencing tasks
Slower or less effective decision-making in complex situations
Challenges adapting to unexpected changes
Increased likelihood of errors when managing multiple demands